29 Dec
2015
29 Dec
'15
3:02 a.m.
On 28 December 2015 at 10:55, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
Given the risk that any such change will break doctests, I don't think this is a problem worth fixing:
+1 on keeping the status quo -1 on using the verbose object.__repr__ -0.5 on consistently using <...> for all types -0.5 on changing the repr of recursive OrderedDicts to be more like dict
+1 here - I've been persuaded that changing this behaviour isn't worth the disruption (to existing third party documentation, if nothing else). Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia