On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:19:05 am George Sakkis wrote:
I think it would be counter-intuitive and error-prone if min(iterable, default=0) was different from min(*iterable, default=0), so I'd say no on the first one.
That's already the case.
min( iter() )
min( *iter() )
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable