20 Mar
2016
20 Mar
'16
11:23 p.m.
Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas wrote:
More generally, I think if this feature were to be added, "empty" is a reasonable name. The idiomatic way to write it today is something like:
elem = empty = object() for elem in seq: do_stuff(elem) if elem is empty: do_empty_seq_stuff()
So you're basically looking for syntactic sugar that abbreviated "if ... is empty:", right?
Maybe I'm missing something, but shoulnd't be like if seq: for elem in seq: do_stuff(elem) else: do_empty_seq_stuff() a trivial code handling an empty list? -- By ZeD