On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 04/11/2013 15:25, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 31/10/2013 10:31, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 30/10/2013 16:34, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>>> os.path.join('/static', '/styles/largestyles.css') '/styles/largestyles.css'
Is it only me who thinks that the code above is wrong?
Is this the appropriate place for such a question? What is wrong with the main Python mailing list, Stackoverflow...?
-- Python is the second best programming language in the world. But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Both Python ML and SO are bad for inventing new languages. -- anatoly t.
I'm completely baffled by your comment, so please explain yourself.
I mean that if you're going to invent new language or improve existing one, you need a place to keep notes about things that need to be improved, so that you can find them when the time comes. Neither ML nor StackOverflow (SO) are such place.
What on earth has this got to do with your original question, a trivial thing about os.path.join? I'd say this is definitely not the place to be asking this particular question, in fact I'd say anywhere but here.
The question was: 1. if this specific behavior for joining paths is still actual 2. if there are other people who don't expect it to work in this way I find Ruby approach more useful, and it's quite valuable info that the call can not be directly converted between stdlibs.