data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c3b2/3c3b2a6eec514cc32680936fa4e74059574d2631" alt=""
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:50 AM Rhodri James <rhodri@kynesim.co.uk> wrote:
On 27/02/2019 16:25, João Matos wrote:
I would like to propose that instead of using this (applies to Py3.5 and upwards) dict_a = {**dict_a, **dict_b}
we could use dict_a = dict_a + dict_b
or even better dict_a += dict_b
While I don't object to the idea of concatenating dictionaries, I feel obliged to point out that this last is currently spelled dict_a.update(dict_b)
This is likely to be controversial. But I like the idea. After all, we have `list.extend(x)` ~~ `list += x`. The key conundrum that needs to be solved is what to do for `d1 + d2` when there are overlapping keys. I propose to make d2 win in this case, which is what happens in `d1.update(d2)` anyways. If you want it the other way, simply write `d2 + d1`. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)