On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Matt Joiner <anacrolix@gmail.com> wrote:
If this is to be done I'd like to see all special methods supported. One of particular interest to modules is __getattr__...
For What It's Worth, supporting __setattr__ and __getattr__ is one of the few reasons that I have considered subclassing modules. The workarounds of either offering public set_varX and get_varX functions, or moving configuration to a separate singleton, just feel kludgy. Since those module methods would be defined at the far left, I don't think it would mess up understanding any more than they already do on regular classes. (There is always *some* surprise, just because they are unusual.) That said, I personally tend to view modules as a special case of classes, so I wouldn't be shocked if others found it more confusing than I would -- particularly as to whether or not the module's __getattr__ would somehow affect the lookup chain for classes defined within the module. -jJ