On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 12:45, Cade Brown wrote:
> I am positing that Python should contain a constant (similar to True,
> False, None), called Infinity.
What if we created a new syntax [and used it for the repr] that is not currently a valid identifier?
something like "1.INF"
This is out of the box and might be considered insane, but what about:
>>> INF # this is a comment as usual
But I suppose this would be considered a breaking change, since the text "INF#" probably exists in code somewhere.
"I've never met a Kentucky man who wasn't either thinking about going home or actually going home." - Happy Chandler