29 Aug
2019
29 Aug
'19
7:49 a.m.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:58, Ricky Teachey <ricky@teachey.org> wrote:
I like this idea.
The ~foo for Optional is... not that obvious. Not sure it's a win.
I agree. Seems like `foo | None` is just as readable. Assuming that None would be swapped out for NoneType, of course.
Agreed, `foo | None` is short and readable. There really is no need for special syntax for Optional. -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro Gambit Research "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert