April 4, 2022
7:17 a.m.
On 4/04/22 9:12 am, malmiteria wrote:
So, allow me to make it clear, I do get its value. Its value appears in the other use cases i account for, and wanna provide dedicated features for. (before getting rid of super and MRO's ability to provide those use case).
So, if I understand correctly: 1. You hate the existing MRO and super() mechanism with a passion and want to rip it out. 2. People have objected that this would remove useful funcionality. 3. You address 2 by proposing a bunch of new mechanisms to replace the lost functionality. But you haven't adequately justified step 1 yet. There's no point in discussing any of your other proposals until we get past that. -- Greg