Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:35:41 +0200
Tarek Ziadé firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
What about adding in the json package the ability for an object to
provide a different object to serialize ?
This would be useful to translate a class into a structure that can be
passed to json.dumps
How about letting json use the __reduce__ protocol instead?
How would you then write a class that works with both pickle
and json ?
IMO, we'd need a separate method to return a JSON version of
the object, e.g. .__json__(). I'm not sure how deserialization
could be handled, since JSON doesn't support arbitrary object
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jul 29 2010)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611