I have more than once advocated
x:=default
(and there is no clash with the walrus operator, even if others have
said/implied that there is).
not a clash, but you could have a walrus in the default expression, which could be pretty visually confusing. On the other hand, maybe that's a really bad idea anyway. And otherwise I like it.
BTW, => would have a similar problem if it's adopted as a shorter way to spell lambda. And that would be worse, as putting a lambda in a default depression might be good style in some cases :-)
-CHB
Christopher Barker, PhD (Chris)
Python Language Consulting
- Teaching
- Scientific Software Development
- Desktop GUI and Web Development
- wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython