Taro wrote:
Hi all... again,
Built-in types such as float, string, or list are first-class citizens in Python sourcefiles, having syntactic support: myfloat = 1.0 mystring = "my string" mylist = [1,2,4,8] mydict = {1:"a", 2:"b", 3:"c"} myset = {1,2,3}
User-defined classes are second-class citizens, requiring data to be manually converted from a type: mydecimal = Decimal("1.00000000000000001") myrope = Rope("my rope") myblist = BList([1,2,4,8]) myordereddict = OrderedDict((1,"a"), (2, "b"), (3, "c")) myfrozenset = frozenset([1,2,3])
The problem I see with this is, what if you need to use both decimals and floats together? I've often thought that there should be a shorter spelling for decimal numbers, but I was thinking that a simple suffix letter would suffice: mydecimal = 1.0000000000000001d (This assumes of course that the compiler knows how to form a decimal constant, although the actual construction of the constant could be deferred until runtime.) And if you really are suffering repetitive strain injury from having to type 'OrderedDict' 100 times in your code, it seems to me that you could just avoid creating each one individually, and instead have an array of inputs which gets converted to an array of OrderedDict. In other words, one generally doesn't see code where the same repeated item is assigned to 100 individual variables; Most programmers, when they see more than half a dozen similar items, will start thinking about ways in which they can roll up the definitions into an algorithm to generate them. -- Talin