Jan. 23, 2015
1:24 p.m.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
I do not agree that it is ready for review.
I think you have rushed to decide that this needs a PEP, rushed the preparation of the PEP, and now you have rushed the request for review. What's the hurry?
As it stands with the decisions you have made, I cannot support this PEP even though I support the basic idea.
Mmmm... That seemed kind of dogmatic... This thread has been going on for long. I prefer the PEP because it is a concrete proposal. Even if it is rejected, the reasons for the rejection will be documented, so people can be referred to the document instead of spinning this wheel again. Cheers, -- Juancarlo *Añez*