On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:

I do not agree that it is ready for review.

I think you have rushed to decide that this needs a PEP, rushed the
preparation of the PEP, and now you have rushed the request for review.
What's the hurry?

As it stands with the decisions you have made, I cannot support this PEP
even though I support the basic idea.

Mmmm... That seemed kind of dogmatic...

This thread has been going on for long. I prefer the PEP because it is a concrete proposal. Even if it is rejected, the reasons for the rejection will be documented, so people can be referred to the document instead of spinning this wheel again.

Cheers,

Juancarlo Añez