On 8/13/2013 11:12 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> writes:
Ben, I respect your distrust of the CLA's terms (or of CLAs in general), but does that mean you wouldn't contribute the python-daemon implementation under a CLA?
I would not sign such a document, correct.
AFAICT it has no chance of landing in the official source tree if you aren't willing to sign a CLA for it.
The work will be licensed to all recipients under the Apache License, and maintained as expected. Could one of the recipients be the person who makes the submission to the PSF for inclusion in Python core?
IANAL nor am I associated with the PSF and am certainly unqualified to answer. So <opinion elided> In any case I think the topic has moved well into the territory that further conversation and questions should be moved over to the legal-sig list at python-legal-sig@python.org Janzert * legal-sig list webpage can be found at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-legal-sig