Ah, I understand. I don't like it, though I'm not sure I can really express why. One reason is that this would mean that PermSpaces would be mutable, and thus not hashable and not usable as keys in dicts and sets. It would also mean I couldn't use the `CachedProperty` pattern all over the class as I do today. So these are a couple of reasons, there might be more that didn't come to me now.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik@gmail.com> wrote:
perm_space = PermSpace(3)

perm_space.degrees = 3

list(perm_space)

perm_space.degrees = None

list(perm_space)

etc.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ram Rachum <ram@rachum.com> wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean. Can you please give an example?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik@gmail.com> wrote:
Sure, but even list has copy().  I meant settable property on the generator not on the generated permutation.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Ram Rachum <ram@rachum.com> wrote:
Thanks :)

Settable properties are a no-go because I wanted permutation spaces to be immutable. Since the cost of creating a new space is nil (permutations are created on-demand, not on space creation) there isn't a reason to mutate an existing space.

I don't think using a copy() method to would be very nice. But I guess it's a matter of taste.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks great!

Why did you go with "get_rapplied", "unrapplied", etc. instead of having a copy() method and using settable properties?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Ram Rachum <ram@rachum.com> wrote:
Hi guys,

I just wanted to give an update on this: I just released my own code that does this to PyPI: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/combi


Thanks,
Ram.

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Ram Rachum <ram@rachum.com> wrote:
I'll email you if/when it's released :)


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik@gmail.com> wrote:
I really like this and hope that it eventually makes it into the stdlib.  It's also a good argument for your other suggestion whereby some of the itertools to return Iterables rather than Iterators like range does.

Best,

Neil

On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 1:43:20 PM UTC-4, Ram Rachum wrote:
I'm probably going to implement it in my python_toolbox package. I already implemented 30% and it's really cool. It's at the point where I doubt that I want it in the stdlib because I've gotten so much awesome functionality into it and I'd hate to (a) have 80% of it stripped and (b) have the class names changed to be non-Pythonic :)


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Tal Einat <tale...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Ram Rachum <ram.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tal,
>
> I'm using it for a project of my own (optimizing keyboard layout) but I
> can't make the case that it's useful for the stdlib. I'd understand if it
> would be omitted for not being enough of a common need.

At the least, this (a function for getting a specific permutation by
lexicographical-order index) could make a nice cookbook recipe.

- Tal


_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "python-ideas" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/python-ideas/in2gUQMFUzA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to python-ideas+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.