Sept. 26, 2011
4:33 a.m.
On 26 September 2011 07:56, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
So, your proposed use of 'nonlocal' would actually be declaring a name to be *local*. That strikes me as weird and perverse.
Aha! That's precisely the concern I had with the suggestion of "nonlocal" for this, although I had failed to understand *why* it bothered me, and so hadn't commented... Paul