j: Next unread message
k: Previous unread message
j a: Jump to all threads
j l: Jump to MailingList overview
Andrew Bennetts writes:
Jesse Noller wrote:
having a single abstraction to both
Both? What is the referent here? (I couldn't find any in the context provided.)
(but different modules under that abstraction based on os) is attractive (as Stephen pointed out).
Perhaps such an abstraction should be built on top of Ben Finney's proposed unix daemon module, rather than built in?
It seems Jesse and I have been simultaneously masticating. Having now chewed on this issue overnight, I can't see any reason why, given the existence of an implementation of the current PEP, that it couldn't be used to implement some other PEP dealing with a separate-process, service-based model.
That I can't think of any reason why not is likely to mean that there are half a dozen reasons I'm unaware of :-)
-- \ “I went to the museum where they had all the heads and arms | `\ from the statues that are in all the other museums.” —Steven | _o__) Wright | Ben Finney