April 4, 2019
9:04 a.m.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:02 PM Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
+1 on adding a nice simple function, although I'm not 100% sold on the name "output".
The idea is that output/check_output would go together like call/check_call.
Yeah, so I think that on balance it's probably the best choice, but as its own thing, it's a bit odd. subprocess.output("...") I'm, let's say, +1 on the idea in general, and +0.9 on calling it "output". ChrisA