Re: [Python-ideas] Module lifecycle: simple alternative to PEP 3121/PEP 489

Nikita Nemkin <nikita@...> writes:

I mentioned the way to avoid state access overhead in my first post. It's independent of module loading mechanism:

It's great to see people discussing this. I must clarify the 20% slowdown figure that I posted earlier: The slowdown was due to changing the static variables to module state *and* the static types to heap types. It was recommended at the time to do both or nothing. I haven't measured the module state impact in isolation. Stefan Krah