On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> wrote:
On 25/04/17 22:15, Brice PARENT wrote:
it may be easier to get something like this (I think, as there is no new operator involved) :
No new operator, but still a syntax change, so that doesn't help from that POV.
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): self.* = *args self.** = **kwargs
What is "self.* = *args" supposed to do? For each positional argument, what name in the object is it bound to?
E.
For what it's worth, that's what I don't really like about the initially proposed syntax too ... self .= foo, bar, baz works OK, but: tup = foo, bar, baz self .= tup doesn't work. Admittedly, that could be part of the definition of this feature, but it feels really unexpected to all of a sudden give my tuple a temporary name and have the code behave in a dramatically different fashion.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-- Matt Gilson | Pattern Software Engineer getpattern.com <https://www.getpattern.com?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature-matt>