On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Matt Arcidy <marcidy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Mikhail V <mikhailwas@gmail.com> wrote:
to be pedantic - ReallyLongDescriptiveIdentifierNames has also an issue with "I" which might confuse because it looks same as little L. Just to illustrate that choice of comparison samples is very sensitive thing. In such a way an experienced guy can even scam the experimental subjects by making samples which will show what he wants in result.
I love this discussion, but I think anything that isn't included in a .py file would have to be outside the scope, at least of the alpha version :). I am really interested in these factors in general, however. Now I'm surprised no one asks which font each other are using when determining readability.
"serif? are you mad? no wonder!" "+1 on PEP conditional on mandatory yellow (#FFEF00) keyword syntax highlighting in vim"
Well, I am asking. Looking at online PEPs I am under impression everyone should use huge-sized Consolas and no syntax highlighting at all. Just as with "=" and "==". Making samples without highlighting will show a similarity issue. Making it with different highlighting/font style will show that there is no issue. Or, ":=" looks ok with Times New Roman, but with Consolas - it looks like Dr. Zoidberg's face. Mikhail