May 25, 2016
6:48 p.m.
On 05/25/2016 11:44 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 25.05.2016 20:21, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 05/25/2016 11:12 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 25 May 2016 at 17:08, Ethan Furman wrote:
I can't think of a good example where Michael's original proposal that this would give a ValueError would be a better approach.
Agreed. The ValueError approach would make this useless for me.
I think that's why the * syntax might be useful as well.
Maybe. Get the simple case added first; we can add more later if deemed appropriate. -- ~Ethan~