On 24.09.2014 22:24, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Sep 24, 2014, at 03:10 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
I would honestly prefer it to be merged into an already in-place module
(maybe platform?) over it being added separately.
Why platform? That seems out of place.
Agreed. The typical approach is to put a renamed version into
the stdlib, so that there's a possibility to continue using the
package from PyPI.
If it were to be adopted into the stdlib, I think a top-level module name
would be fine. psutil is great, but has anybody asked upstream if they even
want to be part of the stdlib?
That'll have to happen first, indeed. The next question to answer
is: Who will maintain the code in the stdlib ?
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Sep 24 2014)
>>> Python Projects, Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope/Plone.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
2014-09-27: PyDDF Sprint 2014 ... 3 days to go
2014-09-30: Python Meeting Duesseldorf ... 6 days to go
::::: Try our mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611