On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
Note that Greg Stein reached this same conclusion (and similar numbers) over 10 years ago...
It's worth repeating this kind of experiment; the hardware landscape has changed a lot in 10 years. It's interesting that the results are the same a decade later. Collin
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
Ok, out of curiousity I gave it a try: replacing INCREF/DECREF with atomic instructions (*) slows down the interpreter by 20 to 40% depending on the workload. And keep in mind this is the tip of the iceberg: to remove the GIL you'd also have to add fine-grained locking in other places (dicts etc.).
Which makes me agree with the commonly expressed opinion that CPython would probably need to ditch refcounting (at least in the critical paths) if we want to remove the GIL.
Regards
Antoine.
(*) using gcc's atomic primitives which, I have checked, are inlined as carefully optimized assembler: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html#Atomic-Buil...
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas