This seems reasonable, though mostly also non-urgent. Have you thought about how it interacts with PEP 492 yet?

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com> wrote:
Hi all,

Well, after a few days no-one has responded to my post on another
thread about this [1], but the more I thought about it the more this
seemed like a good idea, so I wrote up a little more-formal proposal
(attached) for letting context managers react to 'yield's that occur
within their 'with' block.

This should in many ways be treated as a straw man proposal -- there's
tons I don't know about how async code is written in Python these days
-- but it seems like a good idea to me and I'd like to hear what
everyone else thinks :-).

-n

[1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2015-April/033176.html

--
Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/



--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)