Feb. 27, 2011
8:41 p.m.
Nick Coghlan wrote:
The iterator/iterable precedent suggests manager->manageable as a possibility, but "manageable objects" isn't easy to write *or* to say. "Managed objects" could work, though (despite being slightly less technically correct).
Urk. Maybe eliminating the word "context" is the wrong thing to do, because "managed object" sounds far too vague -- it's far from clear *how* it's being managed. Also highly likely to be confused somehow with "managed code" in the .NET world (which is a confusingly vague term in itself). My current thought is "context manager provider", long-winded though it is. -- Greg