08.04.21 17:59, anthony.flury via Python-ideas пише:
> I was wondering whether a worthwhile extension might be to allow the
> `with` statement to have an `except` and  `else` clauses which would
> have the same
> semantics as wrapping the `with` block with a try - for example the
> above would now look like:
>
>
>     with open('config.cfg', 'r') as cfg:
>         # Process the open  file
>         config = load_config(cfg)
>     except FileNotFound:
>         logging.info('Config file not found - using default configuration')
>     except PermissionError:
>         logging.warning('Cannot open config .cfg - using default
>     configuration')
>         config = default_config()
>     else:
>         logging.info('Using config from config.cfg')

A year or two ago I proposed the same syntax with different semantic: to
catch only exceptions in the context manager, not in the with block.
Exceptions in the with block you can catch by adding try/except around
the with block, exceptions in the with block and the context manager you
can catch by adding try/except around the with statement, but there is
no currently way to catch only exceptions in the context manager.

It is quite a common problem, I encounter it several times per year
since then. I still have a hope to add this feature, and it will
conflict with your idea.

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/OMAEC4EPAWBXBIHHLY75M6GTN6OL4MP4/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/