On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
It would be nice if there was more Kongo as to why it was rejected,

Wow -- weird auto-correct! That was supposed to be "info".

That's what I get for trying to write these notes on a phone on the bus...

Sorry,

-Chris

but it was, indeed, rejected.

I also recall a lot of drawn out threads about more compact syntax for a for loop over integers, such as making the integer object iterable:

for I in 10:
pass

Which were also all rejected.

Unless someone comes up with a compelling argument that something has changed, it seems this conversation has been had already.

-Chris

On Feb 2, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik@gmail.com> wrote:

But it is meaningful to have a range with an unspecified stop.  That's itertools.count.

On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 12:27:53 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Todd wrote:
> Although slices and ranges are used for different things and implemented
> differently, conceptually they are similar: they define an integer sequence
> with a start, stop, and step size.

I'm afraid that you are mistaken. Slices do not necessarily define
integer sequences. They are completely arbitrary, and it is up to the
object being sliced to interpret what is or isn't valid and what the
slice means.

py> class K(object):
...     def __getitem__(self, i):
...             print(i)
...
py> K()["abc":(2,3,4):{}]
slice('abc', (2, 3, 4), {})

In addition, the "stop" argument to a slice may be unspecified until
it it applied to a specific sequence, while range always requires
stop to be defined.

py> s = slice(1, None, 2)
py> "abcde"[s]
'bd'
py> "abcdefghi"[s]
'bdfh'

It isn't meaningful to define a range with an unspecified stop, but it
is meaningful to do so for slices.

In other words, the similarity between slices and ranges is not as close
as you think.

--
Steven
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org

--

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker@noaa.gov