Robert Kern <robert.kern@...> writes:> >>> Python), why not try to use that instead of " <at> " (which in Python
>
> On 2014-03-14 13:20, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> > On 14.03.2014 12:25, Robert Kern wrote:
> >> On 2014-03-14 10:16, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have some questions:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Since in math, the operator is usually spelt "·" (the center dot,
> >>> or "." but that's already reserved for methods and attributes in
> >>> already identifies decorators) ?> similar to standard mathematical notation than an <at> sign, which is as
> >>
> >> I think the current feeling of the Python core team is against
including non-ASCII characters in the
> >> language's keywords or operators. Even if that were not so, I would
still recommend against it
> >> because it would be quite difficult to type. I don't know off-hand the
key combination to do it on
> >> my native system, and it would change from system to system.
> >
> > That's a fair argument. How about using the degree symbol instead: "°" ?
> >
> > (A ° B).T == B.T ° A.T
>
> Your point is taken, though. I do find these smaller symbols more readable
and
big orPutting aside tha ascii problem, ° is easily written using a AZERTY
> bigger than most uppercase characters. Unfortunately, ASCII leaves us few
> single-character options.
>
keyboard. It is smaller and less convoluted than @ and looks like the
mathematical notation for function composition, which is similar to matrix
multiplication.
Still, not ascii and not displayed on every keyboard...
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/