Éric Araujo dixit (2011-11-07, 18:00):
Le 07/11/2011 17:25, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
On Nov 07, 2011, at 05:19 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
OTOH, qname will be easily found in search engine Are you sure about that? I.e. have you tried it? I did, and it made me remember why I didn’t find “qname” cryptic: It is used by XML specs (Antoine, you could mention that in the PEP). Top Google results for “python qname” are XML-related.
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QName http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fully_qualified_name
(#include <disclaimer about wikipedia not being authoritative>)
"scoped" could also be used instead of "qualified". You truly are a great name generator! +1 to either.
But without the underscore in the middle, please. We have __getattribute__ and __deepcopy__, not __get_attribute__ and __deep_copy__. Cheers. *j