On 3 Nov 2008, at 05:52, Zaur Shibzoukhov wrote:

Arnaud Delobelle wrote:

...

Looking at the page, it seems to me that it aims to: * be able to give a string representation of any(*) object like pickle and unlike json * produce human readable output like json and unlike pickle Yes it works that way.

...

(*) for a suitable definition of 'any', ideally the same as pickle I guess. Now pyon can't dump any recursive object. It can dump recursive lists and tuples now. I also going to add support for recursive dicts, and then for other objects.

How do you represent a recursive list? E.g. On 1 Nov 2008, at 19:49, Mathias Panzenböck wrote:

I wonder what it would yield in this case: lst = ['foo'] lst.append(lst)

-- Arnaud

On 3 Nov 2008, at 05:52, Zaur Shibzoukhov wrote:

Arnaud Delobelle wrote:

...

Looking at the page, it seems to me that it aims to: * be able to give a string representation of any(*) object like pickle and unlike json * produce human readable output like json and unlike pickle Yes it works that way.

...

(*) for a suitable definition of 'any', ideally the same as pickle I guess. Now pyon can't dump any recursive object. It can dump recursive lists and tuples now. I also going to add support for recursive dicts, and then for other objects.

How do you represent a recursive list? E.g. On 1 Nov 2008, at 19:49, Mathias Panzenböck wrote:

I wonder what it would yield in this case: lst = ['foo'] lst.append(lst)

-- Arnaud