Re: [Python-ideas] A Continuations Compromise in Python
5 May
2009
5 May
'09
5:15 a.m.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> wrote:
On Sun, 3 May 2009 23:24:44 -0600 Adam Olsen <rhamph@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> wrote:
That looks every bit as significant as the change you get from a list comprehension to me - and these are simplified by ignoring keyword args.
Yet you only need to do that once.
Well, once every time you call a callable that needs a trampoline. That would include any recursive calls that weren't properly tail recursive. That could get ugly pretty fast.
You only need to *define* it once. -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
5480
Age (days ago)
5480
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Adam Olsen