On Jul 31, 2011 8:57 PM, "Christopher King" wrote:

What would happen is if you do something like.

match=re.search('^(?PP<tag>[a-z])*$', 'abc') Then the match.groupdict() would return {'tag.0':'a', 'tag.1':'b', 'tag.2':'c', 'tag.-1':'c', 'tag.-2':'b', 'tag.-3':'a'} notice the PP. This means that it will save all the times it matches.

If you want to return something that supports negative indexing, why not return a list instead of an ad-hoc string representation?

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Christopher King wrote:

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:

...

Could you elaborate on the change? I don't understand your modification. The regex is a different one than the original, as well.

What do you mean by elaborate on the change. You mean explain. I guess I could do it in more detail.

By elaborate on the change, I expect Devin meant a more accurate description of the problem you're trying to solve without the confusing and irrelevant noise about named groups. Specifically:

...

...

match=re.search('^([a-z])*$', 'abcz') match.groups() ('z',)

You're asking for '*' and '+' to change the group numbers based on the number of matches that actually occur. This is untenable, which should become clear as soon as another group is placed after the looping constructs:

...

...

match=re.search('^([a-y])*(.*)$', 'abcz') match.groups() ('c', 'z')

Group names/numbers are assigned when the regex is compiled. They cannot be affected by runtime information based on the string being processed. The way to handle this (while still using the re module to do the parsing) is multi-level parsing:

...

...

match=re.search('^([a-z]*)$', 'abcz') relevant = match.group(0) pattern = re.compile('([a-z])') for match in pattern.finditer(relevant): ... print(match.groups()) ... ('a',) ('b',) ('c',) ('z',)

There's no reason to try to embed the functionality of finditer() into the regex itself (and it's utterly impractical to do so anyway). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:

The "regex" module by Matthew Barnett already supports this:

https://code.google.com/p/mrab-regex-hg/

The PyPI page is more helpful, since it has the docs: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex (the relevant section is the captures() API under "Repeated captures") So clearly it sets up the additional storage under the hood when the pattern is compiled. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia