PEP 428: poll about the joining syntax
8 Oct
2012
8 Oct
'12
9:47 p.m.
Hello, Since there has been some controversy about the joining syntax used in PEP 428 (filesystem path objects), I would like to run an informal poll about it. Please answer with +1/+0/-0/-1 for each proposal: - `p[q]` joins path q to path p - `p + q` joins path q to path p - `p / q` joins path q to path p - `p.join(q)` joins path q to path p (you can include a rationale if you want, but don't forget to vote :-)) Thank you Antoine. -- Software development and contracting: http://pro.pitrou.net
4204
Age (days ago)
4209
Last active (days ago)
81 comments
44 participants
participants (44)
-
Andre Roberge
-
Andrew McNabb
-
Antoine Pitrou
-
Arnaud Delobelle
-
Ben Finney
-
Blake Hyde
-
Calvin Spealman
-
Carlo Pires
-
Chris Jerdonek
-
Christian Heimes
-
Daniel Holth
-
Eric Snow
-
Ethan Furman
-
Georg Brandl
-
Greg Ewing
-
Guido van Rossum
-
Henshaw, Andy
-
INADA Naoki
-
Joachim König
-
Joshua Landau
-
Mark Lawrence
-
Mark Shannon
-
Masklinn
-
Massimo DiPierro
-
Mathias Panzenböck
-
Matt Chaput
-
Michele Lacchia
-
MRAB
-
Nadeem Vawda
-
Nick Coghlan
-
Oleg Broytman
-
Paul Moore
-
Richard Oudkerk
-
rohit sharma
-
Ryan D Hiebert
-
Senthil Kumaran
-
Serhiy Storchaka
-
Stephen J. Turnbull
-
Steven D'Aprano
-
T.B.
-
Terry Reedy
-
Victor Stinner
-
Yuval Greenfield
-
Zachary Ware