It would be nice to have a syntax like [f(x) for x in u and cond(x)] instead of list(map(f,filter(cond,u))). For avoiding interference with a common and it could be [f(x) for x in u andcond cond(x)] or perhaps [f(x) for x in u with cond(x)] if this is not interfering. Josef Eschgfaeller
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Josef Eschgfaeller <esg@unife.it> wrote:
It would be nice to have a syntax like
[f(x) for x in u and cond(x)]
If I understand what you're asking for, Python already supports this. The syntax is: [f(x) for x in u if cond(x)] -- Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D. President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com>
How would that be different from [f(x) for x in u if cond(x)]? - Adam On 27 Sep 2009, at 19:20, Josef Eschgfaeller wrote:
It would be nice to have a syntax like
[f(x) for x in u and cond(x)]
instead of list(map(f,filter(cond,u))).
For avoiding interference with a common and it could be
[f(x) for x in u andcond cond(x)]
or perhaps
[f(x) for x in u with cond(x)]
if this is not interfering.
Josef Eschgfaeller _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
participants (3)
-
Adam Atlas -
Daniel Stutzbach -
Josef Eschgfaeller