Hi, Craig,
Would you care to attach a test script to me directly with links to any 
non-standard dependancies?
Thanks,
Barton


On 7/20/2011 1:22 AM, Craig Farrow wrote:
> Barton,
>
> It is true that getPreload yields True in interactive mode and False 
> in an application, however, that setting has no effect for me.
>
> In interactive mode with the old 2.5 whether Preload is set to True or 
> False the db load time is just over 1 second. In the new 2.5 and 2.6 & 
> 2.7 in both interactive mode and application mode the load time is 
> between 14 and 18 seconds. Everything else is the same between runs; 
> and I'm starting a fresh session for each test.
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Craig.
>
> 18/07/2011 2:47 a.m. dï, Barton pišdimiš:
>> Sounds like you are running in the interactive mode; ie opened python 
>> session interactively in a command prompt and typed
>>
>> import clr
>>
>> In which case;
>>
>> help(clr) # would yield:
>>
>> Help on module clr:
>>
>> NAME
>>     clr
>>
>> FILE
>>     (built-in)
>>
>> DATA
>>     AddReference = <CLRModuleFunction 'AddReference'>
>>     FindAssembly = <CLRModuleFunction 'FindAssembly'>
>>     ListAssemblies = <CLRModuleFunction 'ListAssemblies'>
>>     getPreload = <CLRModuleFunction 'getPreload'>
>>     setPreload = <CLRModuleFunction 'setPreload'>
>>
>> The Preload flag is set to True in interactive mode. Its function is 
>> to load the entire namespace of the default assemblies into the 
>> interpreter's namespace (mostly for debugging).
>>
>> Please confirm that
>>
>> clr.setPreload(False)
>>
>> clears up your concern.
>>
>> Thank you
>> -Barton
>>
>> On 07/03/2011 11:39 PM, Craig Farrow wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm accessing a database through a .NET DLL and I noticed that the
>>> initial open/load function is taking 20 times as long in Python.NET 2.6
>>> as it is in my Python.NET 2.5.
>>>
>>> When I went to check on what 2.5 version I was using I found a newer 
>>> one
>>> on sourceforge; well using pythonnet-2.0-alpha2-clr2.0_py25.zip is
>>> giving the same slow speeds as the 2.6 & 2.7 versions I was trying. The
>>> 2.5 that is giving me fast times (0.8 - 1.2 seconds) versus (18-24
>>> seconds) I got a few years ago in a package called
>>> 'pythonnet-2.0-alpha2.zip' that contained directories for 2.4 & 2.5,
>>> UCS2 & UCS4; the Python.Runtime.DLL is dated 6 Sep 2007.
>>>
>>> Any idea why the speed difference? And is it possible to get back to 
>>> the
>>> fast version for 2.6 & 2.7?
>>>
>>> I'm running Windows 7, 32 bit.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Craig.
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________
>>> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet@python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>>>
>>
>
>