Mailman 3 October 2013 - scikit-image

Re: Release time
by Johannes Schönberger 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Unfortunately I have merged 2 (+1): https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/591 https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/668 (https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/669) Back then I thought they were perfect. But during GSoC I changed my mind on some of the design decisions. I also discussed this with Ankit already… Couldn't we just simply remove those functions from __all__ in the feature/__init__.py in the mean time? Am 02.10.2013 um 14:39 schrieb Stéfan van der Walt <stefan(a)sun.ac.za>: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch(a)demuc.de> wrote: >> To finish everything (ORB and FREAK), I guess it needs more time - at least at the current pace. >> >> I recommend to exclude the changes. How would you do that? > > Those PRs haven't been merged, right? So we only need to round off > the ones that are already in. > > Stéfan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >

2 1

Re: Release time
by Johannes Schönberger 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

> How long would it take to fix things up, do you think? If it > introduces a two week delay, we can do it, otherwise it's probably > best to forge ahead without it. To finish everything (ORB and FREAK), I guess it needs more time - at least at the current pace. I recommend to exclude the changes. How would you do that?

2 1

Re: Release time
by Johannes Schönberger 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi Stéfan, I must say that I would not feel comfortable if we'd release 0.9 before the GSoC code is not cleaned up. There are some parts which definitely need an overhaul before we release it to the public in the form of a stable release. I can only speak for the feature detection and description part here… and I am not able to accomplish this until Sunday. Especially, I also need Ankit to polish some things first. Is there a way to hold Ankit's changes back in 0.9 and defer them to 0.10? Johannes Am 02.10.2013 um 14:14 schrieb Stéfan van der Walt <stefan(a)sun.ac.za>: > Hi everyone > > I think we are just about ready for 0.9. Please have a look at > outstanding PRs, and see if there is anything that can be included in > the next release. If all goes well, we can tag the release this > Sunday. > > Stéfan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >

2 1

Release time
by Stéfan van der Walt 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi everyone I think we are just about ready for 0.9. Please have a look at outstanding PRs, and see if there is anything that can be included in the next release. If all goes well, we can tag the release this Sunday. Stéfan

1 0

scikit-image October 2013