Mailman 3 January 2014 - scikit-image

Re: scikit-image paper
by François Boulogne Jan. 28, 2014

Jan. 28, 2014

Hi, I think we should decide where and how we write codes, in the text with a snippet style and/or at the end with a full code. I don't know how it depends on the journal where you want to submit the paper. Have you reached a consensus about that? Thank you. Best. -- François Boulogne. http://www.sciunto.org GPG fingerprint: 25F6 C971 4875 A6C1 EDD1 75C8 1AA7 216E 32D5 F22F

4 4

Re: Examples relicensing proposal
by Juan Nunez-Iglesias Jan. 28, 2014

Jan. 28, 2014

Sheesh. Licensing is hard. =) Having read CC0, I'd be ok with the examples being under that license. I'll let you decide whether you prefer the dual-license complexity. Juan. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch(a)demuc.de>wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Basically I am OK with this, but doesn't that mean that we have to ask > every single person who ever contributed to the examples section for > permission? > > What's the effort to include a small BSD license footnote to a slide > opposed to asking all these people and having two different licenses > in the project? > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan(a)sun.ac.za> > wrote: > > Hi, folks > > > > I just realised that having our examples licensed under BSD > > technically means that one has to display the license even in slide > > shows. I'd like to make it as easy as possible for people to > > advertise our tools, so could we consider relicensing those as CC0? > > > > Regards > > Stéfan > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "scikit-image" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >

1 0

Re: Examples relicensing proposal
by Johannes Schönberger Jan. 28, 2014

Jan. 28, 2014

Hi Stefan, Basically I am OK with this, but doesn't that mean that we have to ask every single person who ever contributed to the examples section for permission? What's the effort to include a small BSD license footnote to a slide opposed to asking all these people and having two different licenses in the project? On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan(a)sun.ac.za> wrote: > Hi, folks > > I just realised that having our examples licensed under BSD > technically means that one has to display the license even in slide > shows. I'd like to make it as easy as possible for people to > advertise our tools, so could we consider relicensing those as CC0? > > Regards > Stéfan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

1 0

Examples relicensing proposal
by Stéfan van der Walt Jan. 28, 2014

Jan. 28, 2014

Hi, folks I just realised that having our examples licensed under BSD technically means that one has to display the license even in slide shows. I'd like to make it as easy as possible for people to advertise our tools, so could we consider relicensing those as CC0? Regards Stéfan

1 0

Access to an OSX machine
by Stéfan van der Walt Jan. 27, 2014

Jan. 27, 2014

Hi everyone In trying to solve [0], we need access to OSX. Does someone have a server we can use for testing? Thanks, StÃ©fan [0] https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/835

2 2

Re: imsave PIL quality for JPGs
by Stéfan van der Walt Jan. 27, 2014

Jan. 27, 2014

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:54:17 -0500, Johannes SchÃ¶nberger wrote: > Does anyone know how to set the quality of JPG images (the PIL plugin > does not expose the "quality" parameter)? Is there another plugin that > lets one adjust it? A bit arcane, but here goes: from skimage.io._plugins import freeimage_plugin freeimage_plugin.write(array, filename, flags=freeimage_plugin.IO_FLAGS.JPEG_QUALITYSUPERB) StÃ©fan

2 1

imsave PIL quality for JPGs
by Johannes Schönberger Jan. 27, 2014

Jan. 27, 2014

Hi everyone, Does anyone know how to set the quality of JPG images (the PIL plugin does not expose the "quality" parameter)? Is there another plugin that lets one adjust it? Thanks, Johannes

1 0

Re: Non-local means denoising
by Stéfan van der Walt Jan. 26, 2014

Jan. 26, 2014

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:52:46 +1100, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > I do remember these, but it's a worthwhile conversation to bring up every > so often as tools mature and more people contribute. To be honest I know > next to nothing about CUDA and GPU programming, I just see the success > stories fly by. =) Those are the only stories people like to tell, but they forget to mention that GPU implementations often need to be tweaked for each platform--and tweaks can be fairly extensive, including buffer and pool sizes, algorithm configurations etc. It is not the kind of complication I would like to deal with--but, like you say, it is good to evaluate this from time to time. StÃ©fan

2 2

Re: Non-local means denoising
by Stéfan van der Walt Jan. 25, 2014

Jan. 25, 2014

On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 23:49:29 +1100, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > I'm personally very interested, yes! Regarding scikit-image, I'm not sure > whether StÃ©fan would be happy to go down the GPU route (and CUDA more > specifically), but my feeling is that a very large chunk of scientific > computing is going in that direction, so it would be good to have at least > an optional dependency there... We've considered this before (recall discussions about multiple backends), but in the end found that it is not viable to maintain multiple implementations of the same code (at least not for our small team). I am putting my bets on tools like Numba, Parakeet, etc. to save us from Python's slowness. StÃ©fan

2 1

Re: Non-local means denoising
by Emmanuelle Gouillart Jan. 25, 2014

Jan. 25, 2014

> I'm personally very interested, yes! Regarding scikit-image, I'm not sure > whether StÃ©fan would be happy to go down the GPU route (and CUDA more > specifically), but my feeling is that a very large chunk of scientific > computing is going in that direction, so it would be good to have at least an > optional dependency there... Sorry, I must have been unclear; I was not suggesting to include the CUDA code in scikit-image, I don't think cuda is mature and flexible enough yet to allow for an easily maintanable + cross-platform integration in scikit-image. However since I know that you work with large data, I could put this pycuda code in another repository so that it could be used by other people than my team. Emma

2 1