2010/6/10 Stéfan van der Walt
On 9 June 2010 18:07, S. Chris Colbert
wrote: Considering that we are vying for adoption, I would hold off adopting a new build system until it (or we) become more popular.
Sure, it is optional (and also, Bento has the ability to generate distutils compatible setup.py files if needed). I would like to show support for David's effort, which I think is by far the best and cleanest design. I'm sure our adoption will only strengthen his case.
Looks good, I really like the bento.info format. And the new name. I'm a bit puzzled about the binary code inside the bentomaker file, what's going on there?
It builds fine, so no reason to merge it into your master branch soon I think. Cheers, Ralf