2010/6/10 Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za>
On 9 June 2010 18:07, S. Chris Colbert <sccolbert@gmail.com> wrote:
> Considering that we are vying for adoption, I would hold off adopting a new
> build system until it (or we) become more popular.

Sure, it is optional (and also, Bento has the ability to generate
distutils compatible setup.py files if needed).  I would like to show
support for David's effort, which I think is by far the best and
cleanest design.  I'm sure our adoption will only strengthen his case.

Looks good, I really like the bento.info format. And the new name. I'm a bit puzzled about the binary code inside the bentomaker file, what's going on there?

It builds fine, so no reason to merge it into your master branch soon I think.