Cool suggestions, thanks!  Although I don't have multiple images of the same region of one of our surfaces, I will try it out next time we take images.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za> wrote:
Hi Adam

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Adam Hughes <hughesadam87@gmail.com> wrote:
> One last thing to add to this thread.  We also have the issue that some
> images were taken at low resolution, or low magnification.  As a result, it
> becomes quite difficult to ascertain particle distributions.   Unto this
> point, I mostly just made sure to get high quality images, but sometimes
> this is not possible due to microscope-induced artifacts at long image
> times.  Have you any suggestions or examples for improving low res images of
> small particles?  Otherwise I'll just note the limitations in resolution and
> leave it at that in my writeup.

If you have multiple images of the same object, you could do
super-resolution.  If you only have one image, you could try
single-frame super-resolution, which is essentially dictionary
learning on a large set of similar photos, used to update
high-frequency information in the current image.

Stéfan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scikit-image/EbS7o2HvcUc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all of its topics, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.