Sheesh. Licensing is hard. =)

Having read CC0, I'd be ok with the examples being under that license. I'll let you decide whether you prefer the dual-license complexity.

Juan.



On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch@demuc.de> wrote:
Hi Stefan,

Basically I am OK with this, but doesn't that mean that we have to ask
every single person who ever contributed to the examples section for
permission?

What's the effort to include a small BSD license footnote to a slide
opposed to asking all these people and having two different licenses
in the project?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za> wrote:
> Hi, folks
>
> I just realised that having our examples licensed under BSD
> technically means that one has to display the license even in slide
> shows.  I'd like to make it as easy as possible for people to
> advertise our tools, so could we consider relicensing those as CC0?
>
> Regards
> Stéfan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.