2009/10/4 Damian Eads <eads@soe.ucsc.edu>:
Agreed, I don't think we want to replicate efforts to wrap existing libraries. However, I think rewrapping is acceptable if we offer a much simpler, functional interface than what has been done before. One of the reasons why MATLAB is so popular is its functional style and use of arrays to represent most data. If we can greatly reduce boilerplating then duplicating efforts may be worthwhile.
Right on.
Yes, I still need to integrate the morphology code into your branch, once I get around figuring out how GIT works.
The easiest way may be to: 1. Branch off the current master 2. Copy your changes in and commit as necessary 3. Push back to the server using git push origin <your_current_branch_name> 4. Click on "Request Merge" The most important thing is not to merge with my or other branches while developing. If you feel you'd like to provide a patch that would provide cleanly, you can rebase, as long as you are aware of the problems that can cause (for example, never rebase published changes). Re: morphologie -- should we consider including the code from the other Python library as well? Regards Stéfan