I agree, I think it could be a combined scipy effort. Going to need some Astropy magic for the data io (probably) and the Ra/Dec coordinate handling. Then we can use sklearn and potentially astroml once we have a detection routine?
Stop me if this sounds crazy.
Stuart
I would be joining. But I believe this is not winnable without ML, i.e. only image processing won't do the job.--Michael
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:53:26 PM UTC-7, Ronnie Ghose wrote:i'll go get my sword @stefan :)but great application of ML :3, NASA gets a lot of those false positive thingsOn Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <ste...@sun.ac.za> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Stuart Mumford <stu...@mumford.me.uk> wrote:
I would be willing to contribute but I am already run off my feet, so I really can't offer much.
Josh?Stéfan--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.