Looks good to me as well.

Regards,
Egor Panfilov

2017-10-26 17:54 GMT+03:00 Chris Colbert <sccolbert@gmail.com>:
That's one of the best codes of conduct I've seen. +1 from me.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Steven Silvester <steven.silvester@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Juan.  Also, I had not heard of neurotype, great vocabulary word for the day.


Regards,

Steve


On Oct 25, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu> wrote:

Thanks for letting me know, Juan.

I'd also like to hear from the rest of the community---what are your thoughts?

Stéfan

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 01:58, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
+1 from me. I specifically like having external people to report incidents to.

Juan.

On 25 Oct 2017, 5:33 AM +1100, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu>, wrote:

Hi, everyone

SciPy just merged their Code of Conduct documents after a long
discussion [0]:


I have been hesitant to include anything similar for scikit-image before
I did not feel comfortable with the aloof policing tone typically
employed in similar documents elsewhere.

But, I think the SciPy documents make an important statement about our
vision for an inclusive community, and does so in a friendly but serious
way.

How would you feel about adopting these documents for scikit-image?

Best regards
Stéfan

_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list

_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list

_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image


_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image



_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image