That's one of the best codes of conduct I've seen. +1 from me.On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Steven Silvester <steven.silvester@gmail.com> wrote:I agree with Juan. Also, I had not heard of neurotype, great vocabulary word for the day.Regards,SteveOn Oct 25, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu> wrote:______________________________Thanks for letting me know, Juan.I'd also like to hear from the rest of the community---what are your thoughts?StéfanOn Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 01:58, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:+1 from me. I specifically like having external people to report incidents to.Juan.On 25 Oct 2017, 5:33 AM +1100, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu>, wrote:Hi, everyoneSciPy just merged their Code of Conduct documents after a longdiscussion [0]:I have been hesitant to include anything similar for scikit-image before(other than http://scikit-image.org/community_guidelines.html ), becauseI did not feel comfortable with the aloof policing tone typicallyemployed in similar documents elsewhere.But, I think the SciPy documents make an important statement about ourvision for an inclusive community, and does so in a friendly but seriousway.How would you feel about adopting these documents for scikit-image?Best regardsStéfan_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list_________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image