On Oct 25, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu> wrote:

Thanks for letting me know, Juan.

I'd also like to hear from the rest of the community---what are your thoughts?

Stéfan

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 01:58, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:

+1 from me. I specifically like having external people to report incidents to.

Juan.

On 25 Oct 2017, 5:33 AM +1100, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu>, wrote:

Hi, everyone

SciPy just merged their Code of Conduct documents after a long

discussion [0]:

https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/doc/source/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.rst

https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/doc/source/dev/conduct/report_handling_manual.rst

I have been hesitant to include anything similar for scikit-image before

(other than http://scikit-image.org/community_guidelines.html ), because

I did not feel comfortable with the aloof policing tone typically

employed in similar documents elsewhere.

But, I think the SciPy documents make an important statement about our

vision for an inclusive community, and does so in a friendly but serious

way.

How would you feel about adopting these documents for scikit-image?

Best regards

Stéfan

[0]: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/7963

_______________________________________________

scikit-image mailing list

scikit-image@python.org

https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

_______________________________________________

scikit-image mailing list

scikit-image@python.org

https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image