On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za>wrote:
Hi Ankit
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Ankit Agrawal <aaaagrawal@gmail.com> wrote:
@Stefan and Tony : Did you get a chance to go over my proposal, especially the implementation timeline? I think that implementing FAST instead of BRISK during the summer would make the timeline schedule better. I will implement the BRISK after the Summer of Code. Your thoughts on this?
The proposal looks good; I think we'll have a better idea of a realistic timeline once we start coding, but that seems like a reasonable estimate.
I think it would be helpful if you could Google for some of the recent papers that compared many of these binary features, to see which work best, and then motivate which should be implemented first.
Regards Stéfan
Hi Ankit, My free time has been pretty limited, so I can only give a quick response. The proposal looks good to me too. Here's a couple of feature detection comparisons that may be useful for choosing between implementations: http://computer-vision-talks.com/2011/01/comparison-of-the-opencvs-feature-d... http://computer-vision-talks.com/2011/07/comparison-of-the-opencvs-feature-d... Cheers, -Tony