The blockproc function's signature provides a useful starting point, thanks. 
http://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/blockproc.html

I will have to think about how to do the parallel execution from the function.

Blockproc provides two 'padding' methods: replicate and symmetric. I guess what I need could be called margin, or overlap perhaps. 

For the margin case it might make sense that such a function merely returns an array of block definitions, rather than blocks of pixel data. But this would not be so applicable for the replicate and symmetric cases I think.

R

 

On Saturday, August 31, 2013 6:49:31 PM UTC+2, Johannes Schönberger wrote:
Hi Riaan,

Unfortunately we do not have (at least I do not know of) a function similar to Matlab's `blockproc`. Such feature would be a great addition to skimage!

Regards, Johannes

Am 31.08.2013 um 16:04 schrieb Riaan van den Dool <riaan...@gmail.com>:

> Hi guys
>
> I would like to use scikit-image to process large images, for example (5696, 13500).
>
> In the interest of speed I need to divide the image into smaller sub-images with the possibility of processing these in parallel.
>
> If I define the sub-images so that neighbouring sub-images overlap then edge effects should not be a problem for the algorithm operating on each sub-image.
>
> This is probably a specific case of the more general border/edge-effect handling issue as addressed by the mode parameter here:
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.ndimage.filters.convolve.html
>
> My questions:
>         • Is there already a image-division function/strategy implemented in scikit-image?
>         • Is this something that might be included in future if an implementation is available?
>         • Please share any references to articles or code that deals with this.
> Riaan
>
>
>  
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.