On May 26, 2015, at 1:58 AM, Kai Wiechen <kwiechen1@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Steve,
but these parameters are limited to the range 1..16. The small test patches are 150x150 pixels, the complete images have 1920x1448 pixels. I have applied equalize_adapthist here with default parameters (n_tiles=8).
Best regards,
Kai
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 12:54:34 AM UTC+2, Steven Silvester wrote:Hi Kai,Do the `n_tiles*` arguments not meet your needs? By defining the number of tiles in X and Y, you are equivalently setting a block size.
Regards,Steve
On Monday, May 25, 2015 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-5, Kai Wiechen wrote:Hello,
I am using equalize_adapthist after color deconvolution and some morphological operations to enhance local contrast of nuclei in histological images. There are different results when applying equalize_adapthist when using small patches and larger size whole images (left small patch, right large size whole image). The CLAHE implementation in ImageJ has a 'block size' parameter and the implementation in Pixinsight has a 'Kernel size' parameter to get results depending on the local context. Is it possible to 'simulate' this behaviour with scikit-image?
Best regards,
Kai--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scikit-image/2elntOClGOY/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
